Deliverable reference · 72-page illustrative sample

What is inside a farm cost segregation report

The full structure of the deliverable, section by section, with the numbers from one illustrative sample study on an 18-acre almond farm with two rental houses. Every figure on this page is transcribed from that report, so you can hold your own study against it.

What this is. An illustrative sample report on a made-up farm, watermarked ILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLE on every one of its 72 pages. There is no client in it and no real address. It is not a customer's study, redacted or otherwise, and we do not publish one without that customer's named approval. What is real is the method, the sections, the authorities cited and the schedules: those are what a paying engagement receives.

The farm the sample is built on

A farm is a list of assets, not one building. This one was chosen so that every class a farm study can use appears at least once.

Property type Farm, 18 acres, Stanislaus County, California
Rental houses Two: a main house of 1,850 SF and a cottage of 1,050 SF, both rented
Farm buildings A barn of 3,000 SF and a machine shed of 2,000 SF, both used in farming
Water An irrigation well 180 ft deep, 120 ft of pump column and wire, and a 10 HP submersible pump
Irrigation Micro-sprinklers on 12 acres
Fence 2,400 ft of woven wire perimeter fence
Trees A 12-acre almond block
Placed in service June 2025
Depreciation elections None made. The taxpayer answered no to all three questions the study asks
Purchase price $1,850,000
Land (not depreciable) $1,073,000, 58.0% of the purchase price, from an illustrative county roll
Depreciable basis $777,000

How one purchase price became a list

This is Section 1.2 of the report. Land is set aside first. The trees are carried at their own value, $72,053. The $704,947 that remains is spread across every building and site asset in proportion to its replacement cost new less depreciation for age (RCNLD), in whole dollars, so the parts add to the whole. Each building's replacement cost new is multiplied by its normal percent good for its age, read from published age-life tables. It is not adjusted for condition.

Asset Size Replacement cost new % good RCNLD Share Allocated
Main house (rental) 1,850 SF $441,408 48% $211,876 51.96% $366,303
Cottage (rental) 1,050 SF $250,529 36% $90,190 22.12% $155,926
Barn 3,000 SF $80,430 10% $8,043 1.97% $13,905
Machine shed 2,000 SF $41,440 31% $12,846 3.15% $22,210
Irrigation well 180 ft $13,860 n/a* $13,860 3.40% $23,962
Pump column and wire 120 ft $2,686 n/a* $2,686 0.66% $4,644
Submersible pump, 10 HP 1 $7,304 n/a* $7,304 1.79% $12,628
Micro-sprinklers: emitter lines, filters and controls 12 acres $30,584 n/a* $30,584 7.50% $52,875
Micro-sprinklers: buried mainline and submains 12 acres $13,107 n/a* $13,107 3.21% $22,661
Perimeter fence, woven wire 2,400 ft $17,256 n/a* $17,256 4.23% $29,833
Total $898,604 $407,753 100.00% $704,947

* Weighted at replacement cost new without a reduction for age: the well, pump, pump column and irrigation because the published tables give no average life for them, and the fence because no year built is stated for it. Each house's total comes from this table. How that total divides among the house's own components comes from the same residential cost model we use for every rental house, so a farm house and a house in town are measured alike.

What the sample allocated, class by class

This is Sections 1.1 and 3 of the report. The six class amounts add to the depreciable basis exactly, which is the check to run on any study. A farm uses classes no other property type on this site does: 10-year trees, and 20-year farm buildings.

Recovery class Basis Share First year
5-year personal property
200% declining balance, half-year
Inside the two rental houses: appliances, removable light fixtures, vinyl and carpet, blinds, closet shelving and similar items. $29,385 in the main house and $10,082 in the cottage.
$39,467 5.1% $39,467
7-year personal property
200% declining balance, half-year
The above-ground half of the micro-sprinkler system $52,875; the woven wire perimeter fence $29,833; the 10 HP submersible pump $12,628. Equipment that came with the farm is used, so it is 7-year and not 5-year.
$95,336 12.3% $95,336
10-year trees and vines bearing fruit or nuts
Straight line, half-year
The 12-acre almond block. The method is straight line because the law requires it for trees and vines; declining balance is not available.
$72,053 9.3% $72,053
15-year land improvements
150% declining balance, half-year
The irrigation well $23,962; the buried mainline and submains $22,661; the pump column and wire $4,644; and the paving, fencing, landscaping and drainage beside the two houses, $23,749 at the main house and $10,252 at the cottage.
$85,268 11.0% $85,268
20-year farm building
150% declining balance, half-year
The barn $13,905 and the machine shed $22,210. Both are older buildings, so their share of the price is reduced for age (Section 1.2). The classification depends on the building being used in farming.
$36,115 4.6% $36,115
27.5-year residential real property
Straight line, mid-month
The structure of the two rental houses: framing, foundation, roofing, plumbing, electrical, heating and cooling, built-in cabinets and the rest. Real property takes no bonus depreciation.
$448,761 57.8% $8,840
Depreciable basis $777,000 100.0% $337,079
Shorter-life property, a recovery period of 20 years or less $328,239 42.2%

Read this as one result, not as a range. This farm's shorter-life property is 42.2% of basis, which sits inside the 8–65% we model for farms, and says nothing about where any other farm lands. First-year figures are deductions, not tax saved. They apply bonus depreciation of 100% to the classes that qualify, which here is $328,239 of basis, and each class's own first-year rate to what remains. If the whole basis were carried as a 27.5-year rental, the first year would be $15,305.

Two measures, and why the report keeps them apart

The report prints shorter-life property and bonus-eligible basis as two lines and says they are not added together. The first counts property by how long it is depreciated. The second counts property that qualifies for bonus depreciation, which depends on the recovery period and also on the taxpayer's elections and the acquisition date. In this sample the two are the same $328,239 because no election was made. With an election they part, and the study would show it.

20 years or less

  • 5-year: appliances, flooring and fixtures inside the rental houses
  • 7-year: fences, pumps, the above-ground half of irrigation, and equipment that came with the farm
  • 10-year, straight line: trees and vines that bear fruit or nuts
  • 15-year: the well, buried pipe, and the paving and site work beside the houses
  • 20-year: a barn, shop or shed used in farming

Stays where it is

  • Land. $1,073,000 here, and never depreciated
  • Preparing land for planting. Clearing, levelling and ripping are part of the land
  • The structure of each rental house. $448,761 here, at 27.5 years
  • A house the owner lives in. Its share of the price is left out of the study

The 72 pages, section by section

Fourteen numbered sections and six appendices. The page numbers below are this sample's; a farm with more buildings runs longer.

Section 1

Executive summary, first-year analysis and allocation bridge

pp. 4 to 15

The cost of the property, the land and the depreciable basis, then four headline measures: shorter-life property, bonus-eligible basis, first-year depreciation with the study, and first-year depreciation if the whole basis were carried as a 27.5-year rental. The report says in plain words that the first two are different things and are not added together. A CPA quick-reference page follows, then the first year by class (1.1) and the allocation bridge (1.2): land first, then trees at their own value, then every building and site asset in proportion to its replacement cost new less depreciation for age. The bridge closes with the sources relied on and their evidence status, what was deliberately left out, and every farm asset category marked declared, not declared, or not assessed.

Section 2

Property summary and farm property use

pp. 16 to 21

The facts of the property, then each structure and site asset one by one (2.1) with the facts the study was given about it and who stated each one. A classification that depends on how an asset is used rests on a statement of that use, never on a photograph.

Section 3

Cost allocation summary

p. 22

One row per recovery class with the Rev. Proc. 87-56 asset class or Code section it rests on, the assets it contains, its basis and its share. The rows add to the depreciable basis.

Section 4

Detailed asset schedule and reconciliation

pp. 23 to 27

Every asset in the study, grouped by the building or site asset it belongs to. Each house has its own table of components, and the farm buildings, equipment and site improvements share one. Section 4.1 ties the cost of the property to land, to the assets and to the classes.

Section 5

Farm classification analysis

pp. 28 to 33

For every asset: what it is, how it is used, what supports those facts, the class it takes and why, and what class would apply instead if a fact it rests on turned out otherwise, including why equipment that came with the farm is 7-year and why trees are straight line.

Section 6

MACRS depreciation schedules

pp. 34 to 38

A year-by-year schedule for each class that carries basis, in order of recovery period, with real property last, and the federal bonus treatment stated above each table.

Section 7

Land

p. 39

The land figure, where it came from, and the statement that the cost of clearing, levelling and ripping land for planting is part of the land.

Section 8

Facts and assumptions, sensitivity and limitations

pp. 40 to 41

The dates, the three depreciation election questions and the taxpayer's answer to each, and which facts were stated and which assumed. Section 8.1 lists each assumption the result depends on and what would change if it turned out otherwise.

Section 9

Methodology and basis of analysis

pp. 42 to 45

How replacement cost new is worked out and reduced for age with published age-life tables, the public sources the unit costs come from, and a plain statement that the split of an irrigation system between equipment and buried pipe is a modelling judgement and not an Internal Revenue Service table.

Section 10

Schedule for fixed asset ledger entry

pp. 46 to 49

One line per asset with its basis, recovery period, method, convention and bonus percentage, ready to enter into fixed-asset software. The lines add to the depreciable basis.

Sections 11 to 14

Legal authority, recapture, practitioner review and conclusion

pp. 50 to 56

The authorities each classification rests on, how depreciation is recaptured on a sale for each kind of property, a walk from the cost of the property to each asset's class and first-year figure for the tax preparer, and a one-paragraph conclusion.

Sections Appendices A to F

Cost derivation, ledger, quality elements, framework, class reference and disclaimers

pp. 57 to 72

Each structure's replacement cost new and how it was restated to this property's location and prices, the 13 quality elements of IRS Publication 5653 and where the report addresses each, the class lives and recovery periods of every class used, record keeping, and what the report is and is not.

What this sample does not contain, and why

There are no photographs in it: a farm study is built from the list of what is on the farm. There is no catch-up calculation for a farm bought in an earlier year, because we do not yet offer that for farms. And it does not compute depreciation under the alternative depreciation system: a farm whose owner has made one of the three elections is held for review instead. We would rather tell you what is absent than describe a section you would not receive.

Where the costs come from

Unit costs for farm buildings, single-purpose structures, fences, wells, pumps and irrigation come from public agricultural cost data published by the State of California and the University of California, together with nationally recognized construction cost data. Section 9 of the report names each source and the year relied upon.

One thing in it is our judgement, and the report says so. Each irrigation system is carried as two assets: emitter lines, filters and controls above ground as farm equipment, and mainline and submains below ground as a land improvement, at 70 percent and 30 percent of the system's cost. That split is a modelling judgement, not an Internal Revenue Service table. Its source is the State of California's rural cost handbook, which states the ratio for vineyard drip systems; applying it to other systems is ours.

Report questions

Is this a real customer's study?
No. It is an illustrative sample built on a made-up farm, watermarked ILLUSTRATIVE SAMPLE on every page. There is no client in it and no real address. We do not publish a customer's report, redacted or otherwise, without that customer's named approval. What is real is the method, the sections, the authorities cited and the schedules.
The sample shows 42.2%. Is that what my farm will do?
No. 42.2% is one result, and 8–65% is the range we model for farms. This farm has a barn and a machine shed, a well, an irrigation system, a fence and twelve acres of bearing trees beside its two houses, so a large share of what was bought has a recovery period of 20 years or less. A farm that is two houses and bare ground lands near the bottom of the range, and an orchard with no house can land near the top. The land share moves the answer more than anything else.
Why is land 58% of the price?
Because on a farm the ground is usually most of what is bought. Land is not depreciable, so the land figure decides more of the result than any other input. In this sample it comes from an illustrative county roll. On a real study we will not set farm land from a statistical estimate alone: it has to be supported by the county, an appraisal or a reviewer's documented figure before the study is final.
What if my barn is not used for farming?
Then it is not 20-year property. A general barn, shop or shed is 20-year property when it is used in farming. The same building used to store things for the rental houses follows the houses. Nobody can tell which from the outside, so we ask, and a final study waits for the answer.
How were the trees valued?
From the county's own tree and vine value, scaled by the purchase price over the total assessed value, which gives $72,053. The report also prints what the trees would cost to establish at their age, $81,761, as a check only. When an appraisal or a county value exists it sets the figure; cost by age is used only when neither does.
What are the three election questions?
Whether the taxpayer has made an election under section 163(j)(7)(C) as an electing farming business, an election not to apply the section 263A uniform capitalization rules to plants, or an election of the alternative depreciation system for this property. Any of them can remove bonus depreciation and lengthen the recovery periods. The sample is correct only because all three answers are no. If any answer is yes or not known, we hold the study for review. Your tax preparer knows the answers.
How is a farm study ordered, and what does it cost?
Send us the list of what is on the farm: each house and building with its size and what it is used for, the well and irrigation, the fences, and the trees or vines with their acreage and age. We reply with a proposal that states the fee and an estimate for your property. The fee follows the purchase price, from $995. A farm bought for the sample's price would be $2,195.

See your farm's numbers, not a sample's.

A farm study starts with a list: each house and building with its size and what it is used for, the well and irrigation, the fences, and the trees or vines. Send it to us and we reply with a fixed fee and an estimate for your farm.

Farm cost segregation · All report examples · Audit defense