You already have the cost breakdown. That is the study.
When you build, nothing has to be reconstructed from a purchase price. Your builder's schedule of values already says what each part of the building cost. We classify it line by line, allocate the soft costs across it, and hand your CPA a filing-ready schedule.
Documented costs · Land from your lot closing · No cost modeling · No reconciliation scaling
Did you buy this building, or build it?
It changes where the numbers come from. A purchase has to be broken apart; a build was already broken apart, by whoever wrote the checks.
Your construction ledger becomes the classification directly. Nothing is modeled from square footage and nothing is scaled to fit an estimate. Land comes from the lot closing. This is your study.
Start my new construction study →One purchase price has to be separated into land, building and components using engineering methods and cost data. Same order form, different path. Residential from $495.
Start a standard study →Improved a property you already owned? That is a renovation study →
From schedule of values to depreciation schedule
A study on a purchased building starts with one number and works backwards. A study on a building you constructed starts with the numbers your builder already produced, and works forwards.
A schedule of values, a final draw request, or a job-cost export. Any format. You do not classify anything.
Each direct line goes to its own recovery class. Appliances and carpet at 5 years, driveway and landscaping at 15, structure at 27.5 or 39.
General conditions, the builder fee and permits ride pro-rata onto the direct costs they made possible, and follow each one into its class.
Every submitted dollar appears exactly once, reconciled to the cent against your declared construction cost. The study will not deliver otherwise.
A builder fee is not itself a five-year asset, so it cannot simply be classified. But it is not a 27.5-year asset either. Leaving indirect costs in the building shell quietly understates every accelerated class; pushing them into short-life classes accelerates a fee that nothing supports. Allocating them pro-rata is the defensible middle, and it is only possible when you have a real ledger to allocate across.
A worked example, start to finish
These are the actual figures from our published sample study — a real engine run over a fictional builder ledger for a custom single-family rental. Custom single-family rental, built 2025 (Winter Garden, FL).
Illustrative sample. The property, entity and ledger are fictional; the classification and arithmetic are a genuine engine run. Your result depends on your own documented scope, property type and jurisdiction.
Two dates, and they are not the same date
On a purchase there is one date that matters and it is on the closing statement. On a building you constructed there are two, they are months or years apart, and they do different jobs.
When the building is ready and available for its intended use. For a rental that means when it could be rented, not when the last punch-list item closed. The certificate of occupancy is the usual anchor.
When work began. For self-constructed property this is the date §168(k) looks to, which is why our order form asks when construction began rather than when you closed on the lot.
Getting these backwards is one of the easiest ways to file a new-build study incorrectly, which is why we ask for both separately rather than inferring one from the other. Your CPA confirms the final treatment.
What makes a construction study sharper
You do not need all of these. In rough order of how much difference they make:
No breakdown at all? We can still build the study from industry-standard construction cost data, the same way we do for a purchased property. It is simply the weaker version, and if a ledger is coming we would rather wait for it. We have a cost schedule template (Excel) and a CSV version if your builder needs a format to fill in.
Pricing
New construction is priced exactly like any other study of the same property type and basis. There is no documented-cost surcharge, and there should not be: your ledger makes the study more accurate, not more expensive.
| <$300K | $495 |
| $300K–$700K | $895 |
| $700K–$1M | $995 |
| $1M–$1.5M | $1,295 |
| $1.5M–$2M | $1,595 |
| $2M–$3M | $1,995 |
| <$1M | $1,995 |
| $1M–$3M | $3,295 |
| $3M–$5M | $4,995 |
| $5M–$7M | $6,295 |
| $7M–$10M | $7,795 |
| $10M–$25M | $10,995 |
Basis for a build is your construction cost. The lot is separate and is not part of the depreciable basis. Full pricing for every property type is on the pricing page.
Common questions
Your builder already did the hardest part
The cost breakdown that has been sitting in your closing file is the most defensible input a cost segregation study can have. Send it over and we will turn it into a depreciation schedule.
CPA firm placing this for a client? Order at wholesale in the partner portal →