Cost Segregation Benchmarks 2026

An open-data analysis of 412 cost segregation studies (n=45 per commercial, n=20 per residential) across 13 US residential and commercial property types — reclassification percentages, year-1 federal savings, and US provider pricing.

Published April 30, 2026 Cost Seg Smart Research n = 412 studies (45 per commercial type, 20 per residential) CC-BY 4.0
Executive Summary — Three Findings
  • Furnished short-term rentals reclassify ~63% more depreciable basis than unfurnished single-family rentals. Median STR: 29.8% of basis to 5/7/15-year property. Median SFR: 18.3%. The gap is FF&E — furniture, appliances, fixtures, decor — all 5-year personal property under MACRS.
  • Year-1 federal tax savings on a $500K STR: ~$43,695 (median, 37% bracket, 100% bonus). On the same $500K basis, an unfurnished SFR yields ~$25,740. A medical office produces ~$49,119. A condo: ~$13,543.
  • US cost segregation pricing ranges from $495 to $15,000+ — a 30× spread — for the same IRS-compliant methodology. The variance reflects delivery method (automated remote vs. on-site engineering) and overhead, not report quality.

Cost segregation is a 25-year-old US tax strategy with a marketing problem. Every provider claims customers save "tens of thousands." Few publish numbers. Almost none publish data.

This report is the first open-data benchmark for the industry. We analyzed 412 cost segregation studies spanning 13 property types — from $285K urban condos to $8M garden-style apartment complexes — and published the median reclassification percentages, year-1 federal tax savings, and replacement-cost reconciliation factors. The dataset is licensed CC-BY 4.0: anyone can use, share, or republish with attribution.

How to read this report. These are modeled outcomes, not customer guarantees. The numbers come from a single engine applying real RSMeans 2026 cost data and IRS-recognized MACRS classification rules to representative US property profiles. Individual results depend on property characteristics, accounting elections, taxpayer circumstances, and applicable state/local law. Variance across providers using different engineering methodologies is typically ±2–4 percentage points for the same property. The dataset uses n=45 per commercial, n=20 per residential property type (412 total studies); per-type IQRs are reported alongside medians so readers can see real dispersion, not just point estimates.

Methodology

All 412 studies were generated using the Cost Seg Smart engine (version 2.2.0, calibrated 2026-03-14). The engine applies RSMeans 2026 construction cost data, MACRS classification per Rev. Proc. 87-56, and the methodology described in the IRS Cost Segregation Audit Techniques Guide (Pub 5653). Each study undergoes 16 automated quality-control checks before inclusion.

Property characteristics — square footage, year built, purchase price, location, structural features — are drawn from real US metropolitan property profiles representative of typical investor purchases at each property type.

412
Total studies in dataset (all 13 property types)
97%
QC pass rate across the full sample (100% in 7 of 13 types)

Year-1 federal tax savings are computed as: (5-year basis + 7-year basis + 15-year basis) × bonus depreciation × federal marginal rate. We assume 100% bonus depreciation (current law under OBBBA) and the 37% federal marginal rate. State income tax is excluded for cross-state comparability.

The full methodology page includes engine version disclosures, sample composition, exclusion criteria, and limitations.

Reclassification Percentages by Property Type

The headline number for cost segregation is the reclassification percentage — what share of the depreciable basis (purchase price minus land value) gets moved from the default 27.5-year (residential) or 39-year (commercial) recovery period into shorter 5, 7, or 15-year MACRS classes.

Box-and-whisker chart showing the distribution of total accelerated reclassification percentage across 13 property types in 412 cost segregation studies (n=45 per commercial, n=20 per residential). Medical office, retail, and restaurant lead at 30-34% medians; STR sits at 29.8%; condo is lowest at 14.4%.
Figure 1. Reclassification % distribution by property type. Each box shows IQR; line shows median. every category. STR shows the widest dispersion (IQR 28.6–36.2%) reflecting variation in FF&E packages across furnished rentals. Industrial shows the second-widest band (IQR 19.5–29.8%) reflecting site-improvement intensity differences across logistics versus light industrial properties. Residential long-term categories (SFR, duplex, multifamily) cluster more tightly because their component composition is more standardized.
Property TypenMedian Accel %P25P75Median 5yr %Median 15yr %
Single-Family Rental2018.3%16.5%20.1%8.4%9.8%
Short-Term Rental2029.8%28.6%36.2%19.2%10.9%
Duplex2020.0%19.2%21.1%11.7%8.5%
Triplex2019.1%18.3%20.0%11.2%7.7%
Fourplex2019.6%19.1%20.0%11.9%7.4%
Condo2014.4%14.0%14.6%13.5%0.9%
Multifamily 5+ Units2217.2%16.7%17.5%9.8%7.2%
Office4527.6%25.4%29.0%15.7%10.3%
Medical Office4532.9%30.8%34.0%23.3%8.4%
Retail4532.2%31.4%32.9%18.5%12.8%
Restaurant4530.0%28.9%31.4%21.5%7.8%
Industrial4520.4%19.6%23.6%6.3%13.4%
Mixed-Use4526.2%25.3%27.9%14.5%10.4%

Source: Cost Seg Smart Research, Benchmarks 2026. n = 412, with n=45 in every commercial property-type bucket (n=22 multifamily 5+, n=20 residential).

Stacked horizontal bar chart showing the median 5-year, 7-year, and 15-year MACRS class breakdown for each of 13 property types.
Figure 2. Median allocation across 5-year, 7-year, and 15-year MACRS classes by property type.

Year-1 Federal Tax Savings

Reclassification percentage matters, but what gets paid out is dollars. We computed year-1 federal tax savings for every study using 100% bonus depreciation (per OBBBA) and the 37% top federal marginal rate.

Scatter plot of year-1 federal tax savings vs. purchase price across 412 studies, color-coded by property category.
Figure 3. Year-1 federal tax savings vs. purchase price, by property category.

Year-1 savings normalized to $500K purchase price

Property TypeMedian Year-1 Savings ($500K basis)Implied Effective Year-1 Deduction
Medical Office$49,119~$133K
Retail$45,433~$123K
Restaurant$43,577~$118K
Short-Term Rental$43,695~$118K
Office$39,608~$107K
Mixed-Use$37,836~$102K
Industrial$33,462~$90K
Duplex$28,049~$76K
Fourplex$27,789~$75K
Multifamily 5+$25,902~$70K
Single-Family Rental$25,740~$70K
Triplex$24,098~$65K
Condo$13,543~$37K

Pricing Across US Providers

Bar chart of three US cost segregation provider pricing tiers.
Figure 4. Cost segregation provider pricing tiers in the US.
TierTypical PriceTurnaroundSite Visit
Automated remote$495–$4,495Under 1 hr to 1 weekNo
Mid-tier remote$1,500–$5,0001–4 weeksSometimes
Traditional engineering$5,000–$15,000+4–8 weeksYes

For provider-by-provider scoring across these tiers, the third-party comparison at costsegregationreviews.com ranks 27 cost segregation providers on engineering basis, MACRS classification depth, and audit defense — independent from this dataset's methodology study.

Scatter plot of turnaround time vs. price across the three US provider tiers.
Figure 5. Turnaround time vs. price across US provider tiers.

Bonus Depreciation Context

Bar chart showing US federal bonus depreciation rates 2022 through 2026: 100%, 80%, 60%, 100%, 100%.
Figure 6. US federal bonus depreciation rates, 2022–2026.

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), signed July 2025, permanently restored 100% bonus depreciation for property placed in service after 2024. The full reclassified basis can now be deducted in year one again — a 25–40% increase in year-1 deduction relative to the same study completed under the 2024 60% rate. For the full §168(k) phase-down history and OBBBA statutory mechanics, see the §168(k) bonus depreciation reference.

When Cost Segregation Doesn't Make Sense

The data above shows what cost segregation can produce. It doesn't say everyone should do one. Five scenarios where the math doesn't justify a study:

01

Properties under ~$200K basis

Year-1 savings scale with depreciable basis. Below ~$200K, even a $495 study often produces savings smaller than the study fee plus the time cost of CPA filing changes (Form 3115).

02

Low marginal tax bracket

Year-1 tax savings = accelerated basis × marginal rate. At a 12–22% bracket, the same study produces 30–65% less benefit than at the 37% bracket assumed in this dataset.

03

Passive losses you can't deploy

Most long-term rental owners can only use cost-seg losses against other passive income or via Real Estate Professional Status. Without REPS or passive income, the deduction carries forward but doesn't reduce your tax bill this year.

04

Properties you plan to sell within 2–3 years

Accelerated depreciation creates depreciation recapture on sale (taxed at up to 25%). Short hold periods can convert short-term cash benefit into a wash.

05

Properties already substantially depreciated

If you're past year 5 on a residential property and never did cost seg, a Form 3115 lookback can still recover missed depreciation. Past year 15–20, the remaining basis may not justify the study fee.

06

STRs you're about to convert to long-term

Cost segregation on a furnished STR captures FF&E in 5-year property. Convert to unfurnished long-term within 1–2 years and you may face partial-disposition recapture on the FF&E.

Studies that do make sense almost always have a few characteristics in common: depreciable basis > $250K, marginal tax bracket > 30%, ability to use the resulting losses (passive income, REPS, or material STR participation), and a hold period of 5+ years. If any of those are missing, talk to your CPA before ordering.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the typical cost segregation reclassification percentage?
Median across 412 studies in this dataset: 17.6% for unfurnished SFR, 30.4% for STR, 14.5% for condos, 17.4% for 5+ unit multifamily, 28–35% across most commercial property types. These are modeled medians; individual studies vary by property characteristics and engineering methodology.
Does cost segregation trigger an IRS audit?
No clear evidence that a study itself increases audit probability. Audit risk correlates with study quality (outlier reclassification rates, missing methodology documentation), not with simply having a study. The IRS audits process, not deduction size.
How much does a cost segregation study cost in the US?
$495 to $15,000+ for the same IRS-compliant methodology. Automated providers: $495–$4,495. Mid-tier remote: $1,500–$5,000. Traditional engineering with on-site visits: $5,000–$15,000+. Report quality is methodology-dependent, not price-dependent.
How much can I save in year one with cost segregation?
Median year-1 federal tax savings on a $500K STR at 37% marginal: ~$43,695. On a $500K SFR: ~$25,740. On a $500K medical office: ~$49,119. State tax adders typically increase these by 5–13%.
What property types benefit most?
By median reclassification % — medical office 33.5%, retail 32.0%, restaurant 30.5%, STR 29.8%, office 29.1%, mixed-use 25.7%, industrial 20.3%. Residential long-term rentals cluster around 18–20%. Condos lowest at 14.4%. Each property type has n=20 in this dataset.
Does bonus depreciation still apply in 2026?
Yes. OBBBA (signed July 2025) permanently restored 100% bonus depreciation for property placed in service after 2024. Historically: 100% (2017–2022), 80% (2023), 60% (2024), 100% (2025+).
Can I use cost segregation on a property I bought years ago?
Yes. The IRS allows a "lookback" study via Form 3115 (Application for Change in Accounting Method). You catch up missed depreciation in a single year via Section 481(a) adjustment without amending prior returns.
What's the difference between automated and traditional studies?
Both use the same IRS-compliant methodology. The difference is delivery: automated remote (under 1 hr to 1 week, no site visit) vs. traditional on-site (4–8 weeks, engineer visits property). Across providers, the underlying methodology is largely the same; the differences are in delivery, pricing, and speed.
Why are some property types more variable than others?
STR shows the widest distribution (IQR roughly 28.6–36.2%) because furniture, fixtures, and equipment vary substantially across furnished rentals — a $500K beach cottage and a $500K mountain ski cabin can reclassify materially differently. Industrial also shows wide variance (IQR 19.5–29.8%) reflecting site-improvement intensity differences across logistics warehousing versus light industrial flex space. Residential long-term categories cluster more tightly because their component composition is more standardized. All 13 categories have at least n=20 (n=45 for commercial) in this v1.2 release.

Cite This Report

This report and dataset are released under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0). You may use, share, and adapt the contents for any purpose, including commercial, with attribution.

Standard Citation
Cost Seg Smart Research. (2026). Cost Segregation Benchmarks 2026: What 412 Studies Tell Us About Reclassification, Savings, and Pricing. Cost Seg Smart. https://costsegsmart.com/research/benchmarks-2026/

Download the Dataset

Open Data — Free to Use, Share, and Republish

The full per-study dataset (412 rows) and per-property-type aggregate summary are available below. Both are released under CC-BY 4.0.

Citation requests, data inquiries, methodology challenges: research@costsegsmart.com

Important. This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute tax, legal, or accounting advice. Cost segregation outcomes depend on individual property characteristics, accounting elections, taxpayer circumstances, and applicable federal, state, and local law. Consult a qualified CPA or tax advisor before making decisions based on this data.